On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:43:31 Margaret Lewicka wrote:
> On 4 November 2015 at 12:37, Pino Toscano <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> > NACK, these OS-specific blocks are hard to maintain, and it makes no
> > sense to enclose POSIX headers in them.
> >
> > Can you please try the attached patch? I see Rich already pushed your
> > patch, but IMHO that should be reverted and this one should go...
> 
> 
> Happy to. However, these same header files have been removed in
> 3b17152ec399acb35b23331d2c3b4f424a68824a:
> 
> commit 3b17152ec399acb35b23331d2c3b4f424a68824a
> Author: Richard W.M. Jones <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Sep 29 21:58:41 2015 +0100
> 
>     lib: Remove unused header files.
> 
>     I used ESR's deheader program to look for unused includes.  I then
>     examined each instance by hand, and also test-compiled (on Linux).
> 
> ...which makes me suspect it will happen again at some point unless there
> is some indication that it's a non-Linux include.

Well, it was because something else implicitly pulled it. Note that
sys/un.h is a POSIX header, and it's needed for sockaddr_un [1].

[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_un.h.html

-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs

Reply via email to