I wonder why not to set required amount of memory using guestfs_set_memsize
or setting LIBGUESTFS_MEMSIZE environment variable just for this test?
--
+380979184774
Mykola Ivanets
ср, 23 трав. 2018 о 11:28 Pino Toscano <ptosc...@redhat.com> пише:
> On Wednesday, 16 May 2018 14:43:09 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > With recent Linux kernels, adding and partitioning 255 disks causes
> > the appliance to run out of memory. This causes a test failure in
> > tests/disks/test-255-disks.sh. This change gives the appliance enough
> > memory to complete the test.
>
> TBH raising the amount of memory only for those tests is the solution
> IMHO, since they are very corner cases, and thus it makes sense for
> them to require extra work. In any case, the current default of memory
> seems fine for the majority of the use cases, so I'd delay the default
> change only if strictly needed to work in "usual workloads".
>
> --
> Pino Toscano_______________________________________________
> Libguestfs mailing list
> Libguestfs@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
