On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 12:15:37PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > -#define set_state(h,next_state) ((h)->state) = (next_state) > +#define set_next_state(h,_next_state) ((h)->next_state) = (_next_state) > +#define get_next_state(h) ((h)->next_state) > #define get_state(h) ((h)->state)
So I wonder if it's better to rename get_state as get_last_state or get_visible_state? And/or rename get_next_state/set_next_state to get_state/set_state? Ideas welcome to make the code clearer. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
