On Friday, 29 November 2019 12:47:17 CET Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > In the cover letter you said: > > > A test for this (patch #4) can be applied only when the patches for > > common are applied, and the submodule updated. > > What I have done in similar situations is to combine the patch which > depends on the update to common/ (which I guess is this one) with the > submodule updated commit hash. Example: > > https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v/commit/51c839c77f83fae87c38ee1883ddc52c3dc1e4ad > > This means that pulling in the patch automatically updates the > submodule (at least, sort of, submodules are still a pain).
Interesting approach, let's see if I can do the same without fscking everything up... Thanks, -- Pino Toscano
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
