On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:37:38 CET Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 12:17:42PM +0100, Pino Toscano wrote:
> > On Monday, 27 January 2020 10:39:34 CET Tomáš Golembiovský wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgole...@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > >  podwrapper.pl.in | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/podwrapper.pl.in b/podwrapper.pl.in
> > > index f12a173f..1e4aa149 100755
> > > --- a/podwrapper.pl.in
> > > +++ b/podwrapper.pl.in
> > > @@ -689,6 +689,8 @@ sub find_file
> > >      my $use_path = shift;
> > >      local $_;
> > >  
> > > +    return $input if File::Spec->file_name_is_absolute($input) and -f 
> > > $input;
> > 
> > Do you really need to use file_name_is_absolute? -f seems to work fine
> > also with absolute paths. In case the path is relative, -f will be fine
> > too, as...
> 
> It's all about skipping the code below. The '.' will turn your nice
> absolute path '/foo/bar' into relative path './foo/bar' and the lookup
> will fail.

Oh sorry, most probably I did not explain properly what I meant.

Since -f works on both absolute and relative paths, my suggestion is
to change your line into a simpler:

  return $input if $input;

and most probably removing '.' from the search loop below.

-- 
Pino Toscano

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs

Reply via email to