On 02/21/22 11:22, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:22:04AM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>> +/* Block size constraints. */
>>> +static int
>>> +cache_block_size (nbdkit_next *next, void *handle,
>>> +                  uint32_t *minimum, uint32_t *preferred, uint32_t 
>>> *maximum)
>>> +{
>>> +  if (next->block_size (next, minimum, preferred, maximum) == -1)
>>> +    return -1;
>>> +
>>> +  if (*minimum == 0) {         /* No constraints set by the plugin. */
>>> +    *minimum = 1;
>>> +    *preferred = blksize;
>>> +    *maximum = 0xffffffff;
>>> +  }
>>> +  else if (*maximum >= blksize) {
>>
>> Do we need braces here?
>>
>>> +    *preferred = MAX (*preferred, blksize);
>>> +  }
> 
> I don't think we need them, but it might be clearer with them.

Sorry, I'm still a bit confused whether braces around single statements
are *permitted* -- the rule even seems to vary across the various v2v
projects. My understanding has been that we forbid braces around single
statements, at least in some projects. So what's the rule?

Thanks,
Laszlo

_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs

Reply via email to