On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 04:19:40AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > > > + assert (cr3 = (Int64.add cr2 fudge)) > > Not so in OCaml, where + isn't even polymorphic to int64, so I have to > break out manual calls to Int64.XXX methods. Here, I went with a > helper variable 'fudge'.
No implicit type conversions in OCaml! (as a deliberate choice) You don't need to the parens around Int64.add since function application always binds tightest. You could have written this if you'd wanted: let (+^) = Int64.add ... assert (cr3 = cr2 +^ fudge) Custom operators always have the same precedence as the normal operator with the same first character. Or in recent OCaml versions: assert Int64.(cr3 = cr2 + fudge) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW _______________________________________________ Libguestfs mailing list Libguestfs@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
