On 08.06.23 16:56, Eric Blake wrote:
Widen the length field of NBDRequest to 64-bits, although we can
assert that all current uses are still under 32 bits, because nothing
ever puts us into NBD_MODE_EXTENDED yet. Thus no semantic change. No
semantic change yet.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
assertions about NBD_MAX_BUFFER_SIZE worth a note in commit message?
trace eventsjk nbd_co_request_fail, nbd_co_request_fail, nbd_co_request_fail
missed an update to 64bit
Also, some functions use size_t. Should we move them to uint64_t for
consistancy?
- nbd_co_send_sparse_read
- nbd_co_send_chunk_read
- nbd_co_send_simple_reply
but that may be another story
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list
Libguestfs@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libguestfs
