On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 14:53 +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:12:56PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > counters: update to new sysctl > > > > To allow the interface to be more flexible, I changed the upstream > > sysctl, /proc/sys/vm/hugetlb_dynamic_pool to > > /proc/sys/vm/nr_overcommit_hugepages. This change needs to be reflected > > in the counters test and run_tests.sh > > Hrm... shouldn't the test code check for both options, so it can still > run on older kernels?
I would prefer that we stick with support for exactly the reasons Nish gives. -- Adam Litke - (agl at us.ibm.com) IBM Linux Technology Center ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Libhugetlbfs-devel mailing list Libhugetlbfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libhugetlbfs-devel
