I noticed the timestamp number seems enormous? the point attributes reported seem like reasonable elevation ranges, but the section below that from --check they are out of wack?
I'm sure you guys, the experts, will quickly identify the problem. I just noticed that stuff upon trying to work with it. Thanks to all. Mark On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Howard Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sep 29, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > >> M S wrote: >>> >>> The problem is for all the same .las files of a given provider. It >>> writes out odd elevations. The one I can provide is the same problem >>> for all it seems upon initial inspection. >> >> It's impossible to tell what's wrong without data sample. > > http://liblas.org/ticket/142 might also be at fault. Can we get a copy of a > file for the http://liblas.org/sample sample library? We'll do what it > takes to make sure it works for you too ;) > > Howard > _______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
