Why don't you call it "vodoo lib 98". Then the next release can be "voodoo lib XP". Then "voodoo lib Vista". Or some similar nonsensical sequence. That way we all know what version it is :-) I am SO sick of version numbers that don't match anything or make any sense. Trying to make liblas match the version of LAS it support -- WONDERFUL idea!!! So go to Liblas 1.2.x -- then perhaps we'll skip to liblas 1.4.x (but does that presume pre-4 compatibility?) Michael D. Black Senior Scientist Northrop Grumman Mission Systems
________________________________ From: [email protected] on behalf of Howard Butler Sent: Tue 3/9/2010 12:16 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Liblas-devel] workshop to define LAS 1.4 (was Full waveformlidar data) On Mar 9, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Mateusz Loskot wrote: > Martin Isenburg wrote: >> that is the sentiment i have heard on the showfloor everywhere >> (except in front of the leice booth) (-; >> i suggested to everyone to organize a worksop and create LAS 1.4 and >> do it right. > > Amen to that Martin! > >> LAS 1.3 was a dud and everyone knows is. > > I did risk a bit of prophecy ([1], [2]) some time ago. > I'd risk it again saying that the industry is not taking LAS seriously > by adopting it widely and in compatible way, because of that problem > you point. > > So, the industry does "not much", but enthusiasts like libLAS project > are wasting their precious time putting makeup on every new > head of growing monster. > > [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/liblas-devel/2009-April/000478.html > [2] https://lidarbb.cr.usgs.gov/index.php?showtopic=6385&st=0&p=7712 Additionally, I don't think libLAS is going to implement LAS 1.3 in any near future. I will likely implement reading LAS 1.0-1.2 -style points out of 1.3 files, but I highly doubt we'll implement the full 1.3 spec in any sort of waveform capacity unless someone from the community dumps a giant patch on us. If they go so far as to do that, they own that sandwich they just took a bite out of too :) This also brings up the question of what to name the next libLAS release. We were marching along with specification/release parity (1.1, 1.2, etc), but our next release is scheduled to be called 1.3 and it's not going to have LAS 1.3 support. How about libLAS 1.8? Howard _______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
_______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
