On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Howard Butler wrote: > > On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Mike Grant wrote: > >> On 17/03/10 15:43, Howard Butler wrote: >>> If we think this is legal, it would be a simple extension to allow the >>> LASSchema to be written into a VLR that describes the layout of this >>> extra data *within* the LAS file (as well as coincidently help me >>> describe data in OPC, but that's an unrelated issue). >> >> This sounds like a very neat extension to the LAS format that doesn't >> break the existing specification. > > We'll see what/if the LAS priests say. There might be a difference in how I > read things and what they meant to say :)
At least one priest approves :) https://lidarbb.cr.usgs.gov/index.php?showtopic=9075&st=0&gopid=10599&#entry10599 _______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
