On Jun 7, 2010, at 8:33 AM, Howard Butler wrote: > I think I will rename these to liblas.dll and liblas_c.dll, however, to > eliminate any ambiguity.
This has now been done for the WIN32 build type in the cmake configuration. Since the next version of libLAS is to be called 1.6.0, should we be fully versioning these (ala liblas-1.6.0.dll and liblas_c-1.6.0.dll)? Howard _______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
