Good point, I'd like to suggest also the ability to specify the header separated the same way the fields are going to be. It will create a much more consistent file. e.g. for the moment you can't use tab to seperate header even if your fields are. Having the ability to set a name for the header could be a nice feature too.
Thanks again, Etienne On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Howard Butler <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Randy Bucciarelli wrote: > > > Hi Howard, > > > > Is there a way to format resulting precision of values from the output of > las2txt? > > > > Or does 'las2txt' simply output the precision of the values how there > were initially stored when creating LAS files? > > There isn't, but I agree there should be an option to set/override the > precision of x/y/z values (independently) I have rewritten lasinfo and > las2las using the new C++ API, and I think las2txt should also be rewritten > as well. In summary output and other venues in those rewritten utilities, I > have tried to respect the specified scale/precision of the dimension if it > was set in the header. > > Rewriting las2txt similarly to lasinfo and las2las is in my queue, but I > probably won't get to it for a bit. > > Howard > > PS, this question should be asked on the list, and I have forwarded it > there._______________________________________________ > Liblas-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel >
_______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
