On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Michael P. Gerlek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Martin- > > I don’t understand why you put some of those applications under LGPL -- the > LGPL typically only makes sense for *libraries* that are designed to be > linked against…? (Or are you concerned about 3rd party applications that > could invoke your applications as a separate process?) > Michael , I don’t understand it either ... probably due to my aforementioned own incompetence on those things. (-: Howard suggested LGPL for LASzip so- blue-eyed as I am - I figured it must be a decent license to use. Which license would you suggest? Or maybe someone else has an informed opinion about which license they would like me to put the "open source" part of LAStools under? Please reply only to me and not the entire list. Martin
_______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
