> Actually I just had a thought that on quadratic isoparametric elements
> the Jacobian will be a linear function, so is the idea of the 2*order+1
> to cover this case?

That was my original thought.  Even on distorted bilinear quadrilaterals the
Jacobian will be non-constant.

This predates Roy's has_affine_map() stuff -- presumably you could use that
information to make an intelligent decision about the order needed for
simplices?  The problem there is that the default quadrature order is set
independent of an individual element, so you might only take advantage of
this optimization when all of the elements are affine...

Then again, the default is just that - a default.  You can override it if
you want, and in some cases, for some problems, there is certainly a
performance benefit to under-integrating.  This is possible in my
compressible navier-stokes stuff so long as you lump the mass matrix.

-Ben



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-devel mailing list
Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel

Reply via email to