>> It's up to Ben (don't look a gift horse in the code he's writing for >> you, or something like that), but to me this sounds like the best idea >> so far. > > Well, I'm not looking a gift horse in anything for this situation > because I won't be using this functionality in the near future. I was > just "on the fly" taking a hand in the discussion.
It shall be so. Internally, I'll probably define a Variable class to encapsulate some of these details, but the idea of an optional pointer to a set seems like a good way to go. An empty set will denote the standard behavior - i.e. active everywhere. -Ben ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It is the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Xq1LFB _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list Libmesh-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
