Roy... do you have good test cases for testing this new code out? I've got all of my changes in now... but testing the ParallelMesh node bc stuff is non-obvious (to me anyway). Derek
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Derek Gaston wrote: > > Ok - so there is one hiccup. In mesh_communication.C in redistribute()... >> there is the assumption of only one >> boundary id per node. It looks like it packs the following into >> node_bcs_sent: >> node1 bc1 node2 bc2 etc... >> >> I propose changing that to: >> >> node1 numbc1 bc1 bc2 bc3 node2 numbc2 bc2 bc3 etc... >> >> Essentially just adding the number of bcs attached to that node to the >> packing and then listing all of the bcs out >> that are attached to that node. And then obviously doing the correct >> thing on the other side to unpack them, >> >> Anyone see any holes in this? >> > > Looks good. > --- > Roy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
