On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Roy Stogner wrote: > I've barely even started with the code that *only* PECOS is likely to > use. Adjoint-based parameter sensitivity and error indicators are > both surely in INL's best interests, yes? Where we really go down the > rabbit hole is for the inverse UQ acceleration; forward sensitivity > solves are just step one towards an option for full sensitivity > Hessians and/or Hessian-vector product.
Yes! This is all good for us here! And we are planning on using it "real soon now"... I just wanted to point out that we're not YET so it's not a big deal if the API changes now (in fact... change it as much as you want for now while there isn't a lot of dependence on it). Good to hear about some of your future plans in this direction.. Derek ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Libmesh-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-devel
