On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Vikram Garg wrote: > Yes, removing existing boundary info makes it work. But I guess what > needs to be fixed in the long term is the support for multiple ids > you were mentioning.
Definitely. At the very least a more informative assertion test would be helpful. > Also, I dont see why the boundary ids are already set? Convenience - if you're building a simple domain and you don't already have a convention for "this id means no-slip, that id means Dirichlet inlet velocity, etc." then you can just use the existing ids in your physics. > As a user, there seems to be no way for me to know that. Hmm... not a good way, at least. Example 13 mentions that build_square sets boundary ids, but the documentation for build_square itself doesn't mention it. I'll fix that. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
