On Dec 4, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu> wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Ataollah Mesgarnejad wrote: > >> Ok done. You are right, when I write the output in Nemesis format it >> messes up the gradient. You can get my tweaked adaptivity_ex4 from: >> http://cl.ly/02131w2o2715 . So does this mean that this is a VisIt >> bug?! > > Possible, but not necessarily. You could use Paraview to > double-check? It might be a bug in our Nemesis_IO code, too. Since > all our C1 elements get decimated by that code anyway I doubt anyone's > checking for bugs in more than the "eyeball norm". I know the INL > people have done some C1 stuff (not Clough, but any bug would probably > hit Hermite too) and (most of the?) Nemesis stuff... but I'm not sure > if they've been using them together. > I see, >> PS: I had to make it so it reads a mesh file otherwise Nemesis_IO >> wouldn't work and I would get: this in trace: > > Would you mind rerunning that configuration in dbg mode? > In dbg mode it didn't write any tract files this is the top part of error file from pbs run: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:460: error: attempt to compare a singular iterator to a past-the-end iterator . Objects involved in the operation: iterator "lhs" @ 0x0x7ffffd6041e0 { type = N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPjNSt6__norm6vectorIjSaIjEEEEENSt7__debug6vectorIjS6_EEEE Objects involved in the operation: iterator "lhs" @ 0x0x7fff29fc6610 { type = N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPjNSt6__norm6vectorIjSaIjEEEEENSt7__debug6vectorIjS6_EEEE (mutable iterator); state = singular; references sequence with type `NSt7__debug6vectorIjSaIjEEE' @ 0x0x7fff29fc6610 } iterator "rhs" @ 0x0x7ffffd604300 { type = N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPjNSt6__norm6vectorIjSaIjEEEEENSt7__debug6vectorIjS6_EEEE (mutable iterator); state = past-the-end; references sequence with type `/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:460: error: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:460: error: attempt to compare /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:460: error: attempt to compare a singular iterator to /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.4.6/debug/safe_iterator.h:460: error: attempt to compare a singular iterator to a past-the-end iterator type = N11__gnu_debug14_Safe_iteratorIN9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPjNSt6__norm6vectorIjSaIjEEEEENSt7__debug6vectorIjS6_EEEE (mutable iterator); state = past-the-end; references sequence with type `NSt7__debug6vectorIjSaIjEEE' @ 0x0x7fff29fc6730 } I cleaned it up but you get the idea! Also it should be easy enough to reproduce: just make and run the tweaked adaptivity_ex4 with mesh_file line commented in input file on multi processors. Best, Ata > Thanks, > --- > Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
