On 12/12/2012 06:17 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Jens Lohne Eftang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> With revision 6524 it's still broken. Yep, I'm pulling from svn. > With r6524, will you please uncomment the section > > // std::cout << "base_idx, var, vg, vig, ncg, comp=" > // << base_idx << " " > // << var << " " > // << vg << " " > // << vig << " " > // << ncg << " " > // << comp << '\n'; > > > inside include/base/dof_object.h, function > DofObject::dof_number() > > and repeat your experiment, replying with the results again for the first > three nodes, also with the > node->debug_buffer() as before? > > I'd expect system 0, vars 0,1,2 to have ids 0, 96, and 192, respectively, > from this buffer: > > [ 2 8 257 0 257 96 257 192 257 0 ] Thanks. Here's the output from the first node in the iteration:
base_idx, var, vg, vig, ncg, comp=0 0 0 0 1 0 base_idx, var, vg, vig, ncg, comp=0 0 0 0 1 0 [ 2 8 257 0 257 96 257 192 257 0 ] ... I suspect an indication that's something's not quite right... Jens > > -Ben > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
