On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]>wrote:
> > If you're doing a lot of mixed real-valued-here, complex-valued-there > work, it's a shame we can't do both in the same code. That's been on > my TODO list for aesthetic reasons for years, but AFAIK it's still not > possible with PETSc as the backend. > I think you are right about PETSc. However, Trilinos (and perhaps the interface to LASPACK) migth allow mixed variable types in the same code. So, it might be useful to adapt the interface for solvers other than PETSc. On a related note, though, my application allows me to separate the computations of real and complex types, so I don't really need to iterate between the two. Hence, doing file based I/O works as a solution. I don't know if there are others out there who might need to iterate between solutions of real and complex types, thereby requiring dual types in the same library. This might be a consideration for you to prioritize. Manav ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Own the Future-Intel® Level Up Game Demo Contest 2013 Rise to greatness in Intel's independent game demo contest. Compete for recognition, cash, and the chance to get your game on Steam. $5K grand prize plus 10 genre and skill prizes. Submit your demo by 6/6/13. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel_levelupd2d _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
