On Thu, 18 Apr 2013, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote:

> On Apr 18, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't know how well Ben's and my experiences will carry over to your
>> code - we're using SUPG rather than GLS, so we ought to be getting a
>> better conditioned matrix at the cost of more finicky stability.
>> Don't GLS matrix condition numbers grow like h^-4 instead of h^-2?
>
> Well you did say inviscid, correct?  Then I would think the
> discretizations would be equivalent - modulo your choice of tau.

He did, and I didn't consider the implications of that.  Pay no
attention to my above paragraph; I've been spending too much time
addling my brain staring at tiny viscous boundary layers.
---
Roy

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Precog is a next-generation analytics platform capable of advanced
analytics on semi-structured data. The platform includes APIs for building
apps and a phenomenal toolset for data science. Developers can use
our toolset for easy data analysis & visualization. Get a free account!
http://www2.precog.com/precogplatform/slashdotnewsletter
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to