Hi Roy,

   I just wanted to follow-up on this. The problem was on my side. I
was incorrectly setting up the two-step solver options. The solver is
behaving as expected now.

Thanks,
Manav


On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Manav Bhatia <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Roy. It is pretty high on my list, so I might take a stab at it in
> the next couple of days. Will keep you posted about what I find.
>
> Manav
>
> On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Manav Bhatia wrote:
> >
> >> So, the TwoStepTimeSolver reduces the |F| to 10^-8 in about three
> >> time steps, as opposed to about 100 that I would expect (with two
> >> Newton iterations per time step).
> >
> >> The code modification that I mentioned in my previous email is all
> >> that I changed for use of the TwostepTimeSolver class.
> >
> > I don't see anything wrong with that code modification...  It's still
> > certainly possible there's a bug in your application, but we don't
> > have any test coverage on the TwostepTimeSolver right now and I
> > personally haven't played with it in a long time; I'd give 50/50 odds
> > on there being a library bug.
> >
> > I'll see if I can replicate the problem on some of my test
> > applications here.  I'm swamped right now though so ping me in a
> > couple days if I don't get back to you before then.
> > ---
> > Roy
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users

Reply via email to