On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Manav Bhatia wrote: > On Aug 2, 2013, at 11:05 AM, John Peterson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If you need complex at all, just build everything with complex support >> enabled... > > Yes, that is what I have done so far, but I was considering the possibility > of better runtime efficiency for cases that don't need to be run complex > valued. > > But I understand your concern about a change at the library level.
I'd actually love the ability to instantiate both real and complex valued systems in the same program; "you'd have to disable PETSc" is what kills my interest. We'd still probably be happy to accept a patch if it turned out to be easy enough and if it worked with at least one of the other solvers. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your SQL database under version control now! Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
