On 18 Nov 2013, at 20:00, Roy Stogner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Nov 2013, Hui Zhang wrote: > >> Nobody would like to even say something about this error? > > The list of things I'd like to do is so much longer than the list of > things I have time to do that it saddens me. Manually checking to see > whether an OSX or clang error isn't another false positive doesn't get > priority anymore. Understood. Thanks! > >> Is the ‘make check’ of this program ok on your machines? > > Apparently not since revision 265606bea58 when building with > --enable-complex, now that our auto build system has had time to check > it out. We only tested the regressing patch with real-valued > solutions manually. > > That variable should be declared as a vector<vector<Real> >, not > vector<vector<Number> >. See if that changing that is sufficient on > your system? If so we'll patch the git head right away. I tried your suggest. It passed the ‘make check’. Thanks! > Thanks, > --- > Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
