On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Roy Stogner <royst...@ices.utexas.edu>wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 May 2014, John Peterson wrote: > > OK, I pushed a fix to the 'namespace' branch on github. >> > > Thanks for this! > > Rather than removing the "using" declaration and qualifying two dozen > lines with explicit libMesh:: prefixes, should we just give that > anonymous namespace a name (and nest it in the libMesh namespace too) > and qualify the half-dozen lines that use its helper functions? > It's up to you. The work for the former is already done (except I am pushing a few more patches fixing examples) but if you want to change it please feel free. -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: • 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity • Requirements for releasing software faster • Expert tips and advice for migrating your SCM now http://p.sf.net/sfu/perforce _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
