On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Miguel Angel Salazar de Troya < salazardetr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I should have been more specific. I meant if libmesh could support > the type of adaptive mesh refinement that avoids hanging nodes. > I have read that this creates more degrees of freedom as the refinement > propagates through the mesh and that it might be better to deal with the > hanging nodes instead. > It can lead to more dofs, but is not a bad idea to try testing. However, I'm in unfamiliar territory in that part of the code. I know @roystgnr mentioned to me at one point that arbitrary level refinement patterns should be supported, but hadn't been exercised. Roy/John/Ben, could you guys comment on enforcing a 0-level requirement? It looks like the maintain_level_one argument is deprecated and doesn't accomplish what Miguel is looking for. Any way to set enforcing 0-level refinement patterns? > In Demkowicz's book, they work only with 1-irregular mesh refinement > algorithms, is this also the case for libmesh? > Again, in theory libMesh can support 2-irregular and so forth, but I'm not sure who has exercised that code, if at all. Roy/John/Ben would know better. HTH, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, this first edition is now available. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list Libmesh-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
