Hi,
I am trying to understand the dof numbering a bit better.
The simulation I have at hand is that of a solid mechanics problem with
thermal load. This has a total of ~770,000 dofs, and so far none of the
iterative solves in petsc has provided good convergence property. Hence, I am
stuck with using direct solvers.
As a result, it is important for me to have a fill reducing dof numbering
for my problems. Some of my dofs are coupled only through the dof constraints,
not through a physical element connectivity. I have two different sets of such
coupling constraints. One set is applied independently, and the second set is
applied in addition to the first set.
What I have observed is that the -ksp_type preonly -pc_type lu is able to
solve with only the first set of dof constraints applied (but takes a lot of
memory ~16 GB, which is all that my computer has). However, petsc complains
about insufficient memory when I apply the second set in addition to the first.
I suspect that renumbering the dofs using a fill-reducing criteria by
accounting for these dof constraints could address the problem. However, I am
not sure if the current code setup allows this to be done in libMesh. What I
see is that the partitioners are associated with the MeshBase class, without
any information from the DofMap.
I would appreciate any insight in this matter.
Thanks,
Manav
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Libmesh-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
