2013/1/12 Christian Grothoff <[email protected]>: > On 01/12/2013 12:56 PM, Sascha Swiercy wrote: >> Thank you for your answer. >> >> So regarding my second question, I think it's a good idea to simply >> pass the post data from MHD_get_connection_values to the callback of >> my post processor so I don't have to handle post data at two different >> places. > > You don't. Only if your client for some reason passes the data as part > of the URI arguments you need to worry about getting that data via > MHD_get_connection_values. > > -Christian
Do you mean the case when the request method is POST but the URI contains arguments as if it would be a GET? I tested this case but the URI arguments were stored with MHD_GET_ARGUMENT_KIND as usual. I also couldn't find the relevant lines in your source code that would store post data in a way that it can be retrieved using MHD_get_connection_values. So could you please explain this in detail? Thanks again for your great help. Sascha
