This is a WorldNetDaily printer-friendly version of the article which 
follows.
To view this item online, visit 
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41604

Tuesday, November 23, 2004

'With deepest sympathy'

Posted: November 23, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: Eilhys England contributed to this column.

By David Hackworth
© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Donald Rumsfeld - who's known as a people-eating systems man - has a long 
history that shows he prefers technology to humans. Certainly as SecDef he's 
always gone for high-tech military gear rather than giving the boots on the 
ground max priority when it comes to the basics: armored vehicles and vests, 
sufficient ammo and all the other vital stuff that helps soldiers make it 
through the Valley of Death.

His beloved shock-and-awe whiz-bang wonder weapons worked well enough 
initially in Afghanistan and Iraq, but as we saw on the tube last week, 
we're once again back to the age-old struggle of man against man - with 
grunts, not machines, taking and holding ground.

And now, apparently, Rumsfeld's obsession with machines and their efficiency 
has translated into his using one to replace his own John Hancock on KIA 
(killed in action) letters to parents and spouses. Two Pentagon-based 
colonels, who've both insisted on anonymity to protect their careers, have 
indignantly reported that the SecDef has relinquished this sacred duty to a 
signature device rather than signing the sad documents himself.

When I went to Jim Turner, a good man saddled with a tough job as one of 
Rumsfeld's flacks at the Pentagon, for a confirmation or a denial, he said, 
"Rumsfeld signs the letters himself."

I then went to about a dozen next-of-kin of American soldiers KIA in Iraq. 
Most agreed with the colonels' accusations and said they'd noticed and been 
insulted by the machine-driven signature. One father bitterly commented that 
he thought it was a shame that the SecDef could keep his squash schedule, 
but not find the time to sign his dead son's letter. Several also felt 
compelled to tell me that the letter they received from George Bush also 
looked as though it was not signed personally by the president.

Dr. Ted Smith, whose son Eric was among the first 100 killed in Iraq, notes 
that the letter he received "from the commander in chief was signed with a 
thick, green marking pen. I thought it was stamped then and do even now. He 
had time for golf and the ranch, but not enough to sign a decent signature 
with a pen for his beloved hero soldiers. I was going to send the letter 
back, but did not. I am sorry I didn't."

Sue Niederer, whose son Seth was also killed in Iraq, sums it up:


My son wasn't a person to these people, he was just an entity to play their 
war game. But where are their children? Not one of them knows how any of us 
feel, and they obviously aren't interested in finding out. None of them 
cares. And Rumsfeld depersonalizing his signature - it's a slap in the face, 
don't you think?


Probably. I have devoted so much of my later life crusading to save soldiers 
from uncaring generals and politicians and bureaucrats, who tend so easily 
to view these kids - who are rarely their own flesh and blood - as abstract 
pawns in a virtual game of chess, because I was there. I stood and was 
counted, and I will never forget the pain when I signed KIA letters in Korea 
and Vietnam. I would choke up as I signed them - I could see the boys' 
faces, their cocky smiles, their muddy soldier suits. Each signing 
reinforced the awesome responsibility I carried as a leader to be as 
protective as possible about the young lives entrusted to me.

After I talked with the nearest and dearest of the KIA, I called Turner back 
and told him there was evidence that Rumsfeld's signature was in fact 
machine-produced. I asked him to double-check, and he promised to get me the 
straight skinny by my deadline. But late Friday, I received a typical 
Pentagon duck-and-dodge e-mail: "Regret to say I have not been able to get a 
response as of COB (close of business) today ..."

Throughout World War II, Army Chief of Staff George Marshall made sure that 
President Franklin Roosevelt was briefed in detail on the number of soldiers 
who had fallen. FDR, incidentally, probably wanted to know. He had sons who 
were serving.

I suspect that Sue Niederer and the other kin are on target about how not 
signing the KIA letters helps keep the commander in chief and the SecDef 
detached from the consequences of a nasty war and its messy human fall-out.

---

Col. David H. Hackworth, author of his new best-selling "Steel My Soldiers' 
Hearts," "Price of Honor" and "About Face," has seen duty or reported as a 
sailor, soldier and military correspondent in nearly a dozen wars and 
conflicts - from the end of World War II to the recent fights against 
international terrorism.


-- 
Jay P Hailey ~Meow!~
MSNIM - jayphailey ;
AIM -jayphailey03;
ICQ - 37959005
HTTP://jayphailey.8m.com

My first hint was a kick in the balls. -  Danny DP



_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw

Reply via email to