On 7/15/19 9:01 AM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > This series adds "Since: ..." information as part of the function's > documentation. It helps developers reading our docs to easily figure out > when a function has been introduced. > > For functions missing documentation, it has been added as part of this > series as well. > > And, last but not least, this series addresses everything released since > the first release. For the first release, it doesn't actually make sense > to add "Since: ...", although it would be good to have those functions > documented at some point (but not as part of this series). > > Fabiano Fidêncio (20): > Add "Since: 0.0.3" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.0.5" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.0.6" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.1.0" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.0" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.1" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.2" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.3" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.6" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.7" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.8" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.9" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.10" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.11" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.12" to the documentation > Add "Since: 0.2.13" to the documentation > Add "Since: 1.3.0" to the documentation > Add "Since: 1.4.0" to the documentation > Add "Since: 1.5.0" to the documentation > Add "Since: 1.6.0" to the documentation
Reviewed-by: Cole Robinson <crobi...@redhat.com> I checked the formatting and reviewed the doc strings, and verified that virt-manager test suite doesn't complain so presumably gobject introspection bits are still working for the APIs we use. - Cole _______________________________________________ Libosinfo mailing list Libosinfo@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libosinfo
