Hi Merilee,
thanks for the update.
A quick answer is: yes, they could be useful.
In Wikidata, we ended up dividing the Item of a book in 2 level:
*work* and *edition
*(it is a sort of *manifestation-expression* mashup).

In the Wikimedia world, we thought, we have work-level entities: the
*Hamlet* article on Wikipedia is at work level, so is *Pinocchio*, etc.
When you have a Wikipedia article about a book, often, is at work level.
It's about the book in general, not a particular edition.

On the other hand, in Wikisource we speak about particular edition or
translation of a book. It's a manifestation level (or expression, or both:
never really understood the difference :-)

So, yeah:
in theory, in Wikidata we could import these IDs.

Aubrey

PS: these kind of distinctions are quite subtle and difficult, if you want
to discuss them please refer to the
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Books_task_force page.




On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Proffitt,Merrilee <[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>
>
> Some of you have known about this project which has been in the works for
> some time – works IDs. For those of you who did know about it, they have
> been released. Huzzah!
>
>
>
> http://www.oclc.org/developer/develop/linked-data/worldcat-entities.en.html
>
>
>
> For those of you who are scratching your heads and wondering why this is
> important or how it might be useful, I offer you a great example:
>
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zen_and_the_Art_of_Motorcycle_Maintenance
>
>
>
> Right now, the convention in InfoBox Book, etc. is to note the ISBN and
> other IDs associated with the first edition of a work. Although this is
> useful, in an information retrieval context it is not as useful as it might
> be – adding one or more work IDs to the mix would be useful because the
> work ID can bring back more information about editions published in
> different locations, on different dates, etc.
>
>
>
> http://experiment.worldcat.org/entity/work/data/12477503.html
>
>
>
> I’m curious to hear what you think. Are these identifiers useful in the
> Wikimedia world? Right now OCLC numbers are used, as are VIAF ids, and
> Dewey numbers.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Merrilee
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply via email to