Hello!

Thank you to all who came to the meeting. We currently plan to do something
similar every 3 months or so.

   - *Meeting notes
   <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group/Meetings/2020-02-27>*
   - *15 min summary presentation
   <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikiJournal_Open_Meeting_2020.pdf>*

For those more generally interested:

   - *Mailing list
   <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en>*
   - *On-wiki discussion
   <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Talk:WikiJournal_User_Group>*

Hope to see you at the next one!

On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 5:25 PM WikiJournal of Science contact <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Please join us for an open webinar on the present and future of the
> WikiJournal User Group and its projects!
>
> *8pm UTC 27th of Feb
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=WikiJournals+Open+Meeting&iso=20200227T20>*
> *Jitsi attendance link <https://meet.jit.si/WikiJournalUserGroup>*
> *Meeting plan and agenda
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HtYenGjKds_JMyL7uIgT8kXKELGwVKeZyZsB5DeSgZA/edit#>*
>
>    - 20 mins - Presentation, summary & update of the current project
>    status
>    - 40 minutes - Discussion, questions, ideas & feedback open to all
>    participants
>
> We look forward to seeing you there!
>
>
>
> *Bac**kground:*
> The WikiJournal User Group runs a set of peer reviewed academic journals
> <https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/WikiJournal_User_Group> that have the
> unique feature of being highly Wikipedia integrated. Papers can include
> links to Wikipedia pages, figures are all uploaded to Commons, and
> suitable material (or even whole articles) can be copied over to Wikipedia.
> In fact, Wikipedia pages have even been submitted to the journals for peer
> review.
>
>
> The concept is to couple the rigour of academic peer review with the
> extreme reach of the wiki ecosystem. This improves the accuracy of the
> encyclopedia and its sister projects, and rewards authors with citable,
> indexed publications. Authors are treated the same whether they are
> professors or students, with a focus on the article’s accuracy and
> referencing.
>
> Peer reviews are public (example
> <https://protect-au.mimecast.com/s/DwZlCgZovLtAQBXkCxR07G?domain=na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com>)
>  and
> 75% of reviewers agree to have their identities open.
>
>
> Article formats are flexible and have included:
>
>
>    - Broad review article that also becomes a Wikipedia page (example
>    <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjs/2019.001>)
>    - Existing Wikipedia page submitted for peer review (example
>    <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjh/2019.001>)
>    - Focused review articles that have images or text added to Wikipedia
>    pages (example <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2017.002>)
>    - Technical reviews that can accompany a Wikipedia page (example
>    <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2019.008>)
>    - Stand-alone research articles (example
>    <https://doi.org/10.15347/wjm/2019.007>)
>
> *Can't get enough?*
>
> Follow us at twitter on @WikiJMed <https://twitter.com/WikiJMed> | @
> WikiJSci <https://twitter.com/WikiJSci> | @WikiJHum
> <https://twitter.com/WikiJHum>
>
> See out application to the WMF to found a sister project site
> <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sister_Project_application_for_Wikimedia_Journals_(combined_+_addendum_1).pdf>
>
> Join the WikiJournals general mailing list
> <https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikijournal-en>
>
> Read this piece in the *Signpost*
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2019-06-30/In_focus>
>
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries

Reply via email to