>> Question: >> Is there a licensing problem? > > I don't think so. And I don't think that there's a problem including a > LibreDWG-based version of v.in.dwg in any binary release. > > All of the GRASS source code can be distributed under the terms of > GPLv2 or later, which allows distibution under the terms of GPLv3. > > I'm not sure what (if anything) it means for a binary package to be > "GPLv3 or later" when all of the source code is available under the > "GPLv2 or later" terms.
It means that in order to release a binary package of GRASS including LibreDWG the GRASS source code license must be upgraded to from "GPLv2 or later" to "GPLv3 or later". Felipe Sanches
