+++ Felipe Sanches [2010-02-15 15:53 -0200]: > PS: Wookey, please consider subscribing to our libredwg mailling list.
OK, done. Not sure how much help I'll be, but I'm certainly interested. > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Felipe Sanches <[email protected]> wrote: > > hey! I have just got good output! > Look at the screenshot attached. Does it look like what we're looking for > ? > :-D Wahey. Well done that man. I'm impressed! Was that mostly taking notice of the stroke widths? > I am also attaching the generated SVG file. OK in inkscape 0.46, I still have the huge canvas and searching for text didn't help, but I did eventually find an image. There is an interesting selection of artifacts. Various items collected below the main drawing on top of each other, and a lot of repeated text at tiny scale and even smaller little tiny lines - not sure what they are all from. I'll get out the paper plans and see which of these objects shouldn't be visible. I also get most of the main plan drawing hidden below a given zoom resolutions - then one step bigger and it is already much bigger than the screen. Not sure what is going on there - it is as if there is a large white area overwriting the image. Still, good progress. Manually removing all the objects at -1,180,000 shrinks the image somewhat. All those -1.18million co-ordinates mized in with other more sensible number look suspicious. Some kind of scale/offset error seems likely. Guess I should compare with the libreDWG log co-ordinate output. How does the DWG co-ordinate model work? All absolute or lots of relative chunks, or something more complex? Wookey -- Principal hats: iEndian - Balloonboard - Toby Churchill - Emdebian http://wookware.org/
