I can't find GNU's Free Documentation License at http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical
So that may well be a problem. Duncan -- Sendt fra min vanilla Android mobil On Jul 28, 2013 2:57 PM, "Richard Stallman" <[email protected]> wrote: > [ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider > [ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, > [ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. > > Hamish <[email protected]> wrote: > > the Google Doc Camp has nothing to do with Google Docs. > > Thanks for explaining. Based on those facts, it would be a good thing > to do, although there is one possible problem. > > (and I believe using an OSI-approved license is a pre-condition) > > That could be a problem. I don't know whether they approved the license > we use (the GNU Free Documentation License). > > On principle, we will not ask them for approval of our licenses or > anything that we do. Those people who rejected our values are > not entitled to impose their criteria on us. > > If this turns out to be a problem, I will try asking someone at Google > to change the policy. > > > Manuals for GNU packages are supposed to be written in Texinfo, or in > a format that can be converted automatically into Texinfo. That is one > of our technical standards. > > > -- > Dr Richard Stallman > President, Free Software Foundation > 51 Franklin St > Boston MA 02110 > USA > www.fsf.org www.gnu.org > Skype: No way! That's nonfree (freedom-denying) software. > Use Ekiga or an ordinary phone call. > > >
