That's my point. My intention in the beggining was in fact to create a read-only library. And that's why I'd like to see as soon as possible a read-capable first version.
By the messages and the status of the code, I understood that support for R2004 is the bottleneck rigth now, for releasing 0.4, ok? So, if it is so difficult to solve a bug in this, I would suggest to leave R2004 decoding ability to a next release, 0.5, for example. Why not? One have to start at some point. 2013/8/1 Duncan Lithgow <[email protected]> > May I humbly suggest concentrating on read quality? There are a number of > CAD packages out there that would be able to make good use of read ability > but would be fine continuing to export to their own format for now. This > would build a relationship with the cad software people early on. > > Duncan > > -- > Sendt fra min vanilla Android mobil > On Aug 1, 2013 10:42 PM, "Avneet Kaur" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Felipe Castro <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> Welcome back. >> >> > It's nice to see that people keep working on this stuff. I'm having a >> bit of >> > time to dive into libredwg in these next few months, and I'd like to >> offer >> > some help in order to reach a first release >> >> We feel lucky that we got a chance to work with you. >> >> > Isn't it to get a working and useful reading library for the early >> versions (R13, R14, R2000, R2004)? If >> > it is working, why not to release just like that, an alpha version? >> >> Library supporting these versions. But on parsing R2004 DWG file, it >> throws segFault. >> I think you should go through out once from previous mails to get an Idea. >> >> > Next step, try to work out the writing capability? >> >> Yes, agreed with you. >> We have to concentrate on it's encoding functionality too. >> >> > Next one, work on further versions (R2007, and so on)? >> >> It is already in our GSoC milestones [0]. >> >> > I'm trying to understand the changes in the "refactoring" branch. I >> think >> > it's mainly a matter of splitting the code in some smaller files. More >> > include files to worry about, maybe it's worthwhile, if it brings more >> > organization. >> >> You can suggest any improvements. >> >> >The doxygen stuff is cool also. >> >> Thank you. >> >> > And the r2007 stuff, I didn't touch it, too much for my brain now... >> >> We will do now. :) >> >> [0]: >> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2013/avneet/16001 >> >> -- >> Er. Avneet Kaur >> Blog: www.avneetkhasla.wordpress.com >> >> "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working >> together is success." >> >>
