On 19-Dec-2014 12:28 AM, "Thien-Thi Nguyen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I see that the 'check' target in unit-testing/Makefile names the > C-language programs as dependencies. So doing a "make check" in > that dir essentially builds the programs and does not run them. > So, some followup questions: > > - Is my understanding correct? Yes. > - Is/Was there intent to run the programs? I didn't knew if the tests should be ran automatically. I thought the user should run themselves manually to test. > - If so, how should they be run (invoked)? At the moment, ./entity name does run test for specific entity API. I now think the tests need a change amd should run automatically. > - Is the design of the programs recorded somewhere? Again No. > - Do we want top-level "make check" to recurse into this dir? Yes. > (I assume the answer to the last is "yes", but want to verify.) It is. :) > No worries. I suppose my mucking around in those dirs has not > bothered Piysuh Prakash much, so i'll continue doing so unless > there are objections. Piyush prakash now is a bit busy with his job and if I am correct, he won't be able interact or work for GNU LibreDWG ( Just from the information I have ). So we should continue to do what we want. > AFAIK No. > > OK. I'll add blurbs to README and HACKING once we figure out > the big picture for "make check". Sure. -- Thanks Gaganjyot Jai Sai Naath
