https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159610

Tex2002ans <tex2002ans+libreoff...@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |103427
                 CC|                            |rayk...@gmail.com,
                   |                            |Tex2002ans+LibreOffice@gmai
                   |                            |l.com

--- Comment #1 from Tex2002ans <tex2002ans+libreoff...@gmail.com> ---
CCing Jim on this (since he does a lot of Styles/sidebar work).

Also adding "Sidebar-Styles" metabug.

- - -

Oh, and Bug #159554 was where I first found it 3 days ago. I was messing with
the "ODT file with Frames" that user submitted, and was trying to spot anything
strange with the formatting.

- I always have "Applied Styles" on, so when I saw 0 Frames showing, I didn't
think anything of it.
   - Maybe thought it was made using Direct Formatting.

When I looked a little closer though, and:

- Flicked on "All Styles"

I saw the user actually DID use Frame Styles.

- - -

I was also able to do this with my own fresh ODT document too:

0. Open fresh ODT.
1. Insert > Frame > Frame Interactively.
2. Drag a rectangle onto the document.
3. View > Styles (F11)
   - To make Styles sidebar appear.
4. Along the icons at very top of sidebar:
  - Click "Frame Styles" button.
5. In sidebar:
   - Right-Click > New...
6. In "Organizer" tab:
   - Give my new Frame Style a name.
   - Press OK.
7. In document:
   - Left-Click/Select my frame.
8. In Styles sidebar:
   - Double-Click on my newly created Frame Style.

Then I could:

- Go from "All Styles" -> "Applied Styles" in the dropdown.

and my newly created Frame Style does not appear either.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103427
[Bug 103427] [META] Styles and Formatting sidebar deck and floating window
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to