https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160290
--- Comment #12 from ady <adylo811...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jeff Fortin Tam from comment #11) > I don't know where you are getting your usecase from to justify the current > broken UX, but I at least now have certainty that it is not the industry > standard and not what most users would expect. I never claimed that the current behavior is used on Excel or any other tool. I am also not saying that Calc UX is the best in every aspect; it is certainly not. The only thing I said was that the current behavior in Calc is not unusual nor unexpected, generally speaking. I do understand that you might find it unexpected, but I disagree with users claiming (in some form or another) that "my experience, my expectations and my workflow are all, with no doubt, the same as everyone else". Is the current behavior broken and unexpected? Maybe some users might have such impression, but I would not agree with such statement. Is the current behavior strange, unusual, unexpected, broken? IMO, it is not. Could the current behavior be improved? Probably. Are there other places/features/artifacts in LO that behave in a similar way? Yes. Then consistency should be considered too; otherwise, the partial changes in procedures do result in "unexpected" behavior (because of inconsistency). I would not be surprised if, after changing this behavior, some other user reports that in "some older version" he could click on some cell and apply some action but in a new version some comment is selected instead. I just hope that changing this procedure won't end up requiring from users more steps than the current procedure, especially for the most frequent actions. As said, pros and cons, in every change. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
