https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160686
--- Comment #33 from David <eaglevi...@pm.me> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #31) > But if you take a style defined by default, which is not inherently tied to > some structural aspect of the document, and make a fundamental change to it > - like severing the alternation with its companion style - then you've made > it into something else. Which is also fine, except that you shouldn't use > the style defined by default, you should use a different name for it. And > this change is not a use case of the original style, but of a fundamentally > different style. If the developers consider changing the "Next style" of a style to be a fundamentally different style and that this somehow totally changes some sort of binding spec, then fine. I regularly change the next style for paragraph and page styles. A style that dictates that a page will only appear on the right-hand side or the left-hand side of a book still has a name that gives me a hint of what it does if it's named a Right/Left page, even if the next style used has been changed from the default. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
