https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160881

Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEEDINFO
            Version|24.2.2.2 release            |Inherited From OOo
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.documentfounda
                   |                            |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16
                   |                            |0882
                 CC|                            |stephane.guillou@libreoffic
                   |                            |e.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
         Whiteboard| QA:needsComment            |

--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
<stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> ---
I guess this report, bug 160869 and bug 160882 make me wonder:
What exactly is the difference between "disabled" and "read-only"?
My understanding of the terms is:
- disabled: can not be used / interacted with
- read-only: can be used, but can not be edited
... but what does that mean in terms of form controls?

More on that:
https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/118020/best-practice-readonly-vs-disabled-in-form-controls

(I couldn't find LO help that spells out what the difference is.)

So, following that logic, I think it makes sense that checkboxes and radio
don't have a "read-only" state, given that their binary or tristate values are
static values that can never be entered by hand anyway.
In my opinion, this is "not a bug".
What do you think?

(In OOo 3.3, these two form controls didn't have the Read-only option either)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to