https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160881
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Version|24.2.2.2 release |Inherited From OOo See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 | |0882 CC| |stephane.guillou@libreoffic | |e.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Whiteboard| QA:needsComment | --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <stephane.guil...@libreoffice.org> --- I guess this report, bug 160869 and bug 160882 make me wonder: What exactly is the difference between "disabled" and "read-only"? My understanding of the terms is: - disabled: can not be used / interacted with - read-only: can be used, but can not be edited ... but what does that mean in terms of form controls? More on that: https://ux.stackexchange.com/questions/118020/best-practice-readonly-vs-disabled-in-form-controls (I couldn't find LO help that spells out what the difference is.) So, following that logic, I think it makes sense that checkboxes and radio don't have a "read-only" state, given that their binary or tristate values are static values that can never be entered by hand anyway. In my opinion, this is "not a bug". What do you think? (In OOo 3.3, these two form controls didn't have the Read-only option either) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.