https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155447
--- Comment #7 from Michael Weghorn <m.wegh...@posteo.de> --- (In reply to Joanmarie Diggs from comment #6) > I don't know how other apps or toolkits are using an AccessibleId. Whatever > solution is agreed upon, I'd like it to be something that everyone uses. That sounds reasonable. I'd also prefer having a more widely used solution rather than something LO-specific. Do you know what's the best way to find a consensus on something that would be used more widely? > But > given this statement: > > > You can use this to give a special id to an object to use in tests > > It sounds like API specifically for tools/uses that are NOT screen readers. I don't think this is set in stone, and the doc for the ATK equivalent is not restricted to testing either, so I think it makes sense to adjust the AT-SPI XML documentation as well. Pending MR: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/at-spi2-core/-/merge_requests/161 >From an implementation perspective, using the AccessibleId would IMHO have the advantage that it wouldn't require introducing new object attributes and there's already existing API to easily set that for ATK, GTK 3 and Qt at least. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
