https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161804
Ming Hua <ming.v....@qq.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ming.v....@qq.com
--- Comment #3 from Ming Hua <ming.v....@qq.com> ---
I am not the bug reporter but here are my two cents as a CJK user:
(In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #2)
> Can you please confirm that this is the issue you describe?
The fundamental issue is not changes of fonts between western ones and Asian
ones, but the characters used for the list numbering.
1, 2, 3, ... are the ordinary digits, Unicode 0x0030 to 0x0039.
１, ２, ３, ... are so-called "full-width" [1] digits used by CJK encodings,
Unicode 0xFF10 to 0xFF19.
Most CJK fonts have both sets of characters, and the second set are usually
much wider than the first set, to match the width of kanji/hanzi/Han
characters.
I can more or less reproduce the report, as the list numbering switches between
the half-width and full-width (the reporter call them single-byte and
multi-byte in the original report) sets when I explicitly choose the full-width
numbering, and type half-width digits or latin letters immediately after the
numbering.
You can set both the western font and the Asian font of the document as a
single CJK font (the open source Noto Sans CJK / Source Han Sans will do) and
see the difference more clearly.
1.
https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/00/00000005.html?DbPAR=SHARED#bm_id911622865848718
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
