https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162186
raal <r...@post.cz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
CC| |r...@post.cz
--- Comment #5 from raal <r...@post.cz> ---
This seems to have begun at the below commit in bibisect repository/OS
bibisect-42max.
542c4ff1c90cd5e3920f5ab68f53e644c4018d44 is the first bad commit
commit 542c4ff1c90cd5e3920f5ab68f53e644c4018d44
Author: Matthew Francis <mjay.fran...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat Sep 5 20:10:12 2015 +0800
source-hash-e69aa9572bb2206313cd2aa7edd13da91460f2c4
commit e69aa9572bb2206313cd2aa7edd13da91460f2c4
Author: Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yosh...@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Mon Aug 19 15:28:57 2013 -0400
Commit: Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yosh...@gmail.com>
CommitDate: Mon Aug 19 15:41:02 2013 -0400
fdo#67699: Remove a whole bunch of old hacks.
The new format detection service is much simpler than the old one.
In the new framework, each detection service receives the name of
format
that it is expected to check against, and it should either reject it by
returning an empty string in case the file is not of that format, or
if the file is indeed that format, set the appropriate filter name and
return that type to the caller.
We no longer need to deal with preselected filters (which is dealt with
in the detection framework itself) or return an entirely different
format
that's different from the one being asked to verify.
Change-Id: I3f36951b0ad821d836fb8a56b852e40d43095f09
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
