https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163213
--- Comment #22 from خالد حسني <[email protected]> --- (In reply to László Németh from comment #17) > (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > > Is there any real advantage to majority of LibreOffice users to have mixed > > AAT and OpenType features, even if complementary? Seems very much a corner > > case of interest only to those font designers making it a practice in their > > offerings. > > According to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163213#c11, > hybrid fonts are used by major Japanese font producers, so we must support > that way, like macOS does We do, just fine. What we can’t do, however, is support what Y. Kawara imagines should happen, which is mixing and matching morx and GSUB substitutions. There is no such a thing, you can either apply morx substitutions or GSUB substitutions, not both. What this bug is about, is hiding misleading UI that does not work and only confuses people. If the font has a morx table, morx table substitutions will be used, but the feature dialog is showing GSUB substitutions and turning these on or off has no effect. We can’t show morx substitution because we have no way to control them from HarfBuzz API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
