https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163601
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) > 1. What is the problem that this bug talks about (i.e., how fixing it would > *help* user)? Well, why do we have the red arrow to begin with? And - a very prominent, even garrishly-colored, red arrow? Because it is supposedly very important to us to indicate to the user that there is content overflow from the non-autosized frame. Given that, the arrow direction tells us where content is overflowing. And - right now it's not pointing in the right direction. If we don't care about the direction - let's not make it a triangle pointing in a given direction. Perhaps make the frame have a reddish halo or something. Or even have four small arrows in all directions. What happens right now (and you can see this in the linked-to bug) is that the user believes they need to prevent, or handle, overflow due right - which may not exist. And if we _do_ care about the direction - then we need to point in the directions in which there is overflow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
