https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112687

--- Comment #20 from Alex <lo-bugs-postkas...@21347.de> ---
Not sure if I'm doing things correctly or I hit another strange bug, but - I'm
currently testing some other things with the "mouse as pen"-feature, and I
found that the different versions of LO (on different PCs) I have at hand to
test seem to behave differently regarding the "kind of Ink" generated as well -
which is why I'm commenting here.

In a presentation created with Version: 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) [1a], drawings are a
large set of individual pieces, same for [2].
LOs [1b] and [3] create a single poline just as described here. Now, note that
[1a] and [1b] are seemingly the same version of LO, but used on a different
machines...

Is there any setting that would control that behavior?
One machine [1b, 3] actually is a notebook with touchscreen and a pen - but the
drawings were both made using the mouse.

I added a test document which I edited with both "versions", where the
difference can be seen.

Versions:
[1a]
Version: 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: bbb074479178df812d175f709636b368952c2ce3
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE
Flatpak
Calc: threaded

[1b]
Version: 25.2.3.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: bbb074479178df812d175f709636b368952c2ce3
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE
Flatpak
Calc: threaded

[2]
Version: 25.2.2.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 7370d4be9e3cf6031a51beef54ff3bda878e3fac
CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE
Calc: threaded

[3]
Version: 24.2.7.2 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 420(Build:2)
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 6.8; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: de-DE (de_DE.UTF-8); UI: de-DE
Ubuntu package version: 4:24.2.7-0ubuntu0.24.04.4
Calc: threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to